Navigation

Language Switch

AviQ Platform. All rights reserved.

Market & Trends

Unveiling the Dark Side of Taiwan's Pigeon Racing Industry: Gambling, Crime, and Controversy

AviQ Fast Facts

  • The industry is vast but lacks clear supervisory authority
  • Offshore races have high dropout rates and welfare issues
  • The industry is divided over legalization and regulation

Unveiling the Dark Side of Taiwan's Pigeon Racing Industry: Gambling, Crime, and Controversy

In Taiwan, the ancient sport of pigeon racing has evolved into one of the world's most unique forms. It is no longer merely a competition among enthusiasts over homing ability but is intricately woven with huge sums of money, legal grey areas, and all manner of bizarre criminal methods[citation:5][citation:7]. As animal welfare awareness rises and related controversies come to light, the true face and potential risks of this industry warrant deep investigation.

Pigeon racing in Taiwan originated during the Japanese colonial era, later evolving into a pastime for the working class. Today, it has grown into a vast industrial chain, estimated to involve about 200,000 breeder-trainers and countless investors, with approximately 80 local clubs and millions of racing pigeons participating annually[citation:5]. However, unlike in Europe and America where pigeon racing is seen as a leisure activity for honor, Taiwan's version took on a strong gambling hue in the 1960s, becoming a grey industry lacking legal regulation and a supervising authority[citation:3].

The Spectacle of Cheating and Criminal Chain Spurred by High Stakes

"Wherever there's a competition, there will always be people trying to game the system," said a pigeon breeder, pinpointing the core issue of this industry[citation:5]. Due to lack of oversight and staggering wagers, the official prize pool for a single season can exceed 30 million New Taiwan Dollars (NTD), while reported illegal side-betting pools can reach tens of billions of NTD, far surpassing official prizes[citation:5][citation:7]. This combination of "low regulation" and "lots of cash" has bred all sorts of win-at-all-costs behavior.

Beyond common doping issues, the cheating methods in Taiwan's pigeon racing circles are "creative." National Pigeon Association Chairman Wu Chung-ming revealed common scams like cloning the tracking chips on pigeons' leg rings to secretly send a second "shadow" pigeon across the finish line early[citation:5][citation:7]. More absurdly, it has been reported that competitors have even smuggled their pigeons onto high-speed rail (HSR) to get them to the finish line faster[citation:5].

Psychological tactics are also employed to the extreme. Some trainers deliberately separate the racing pigeon from its lifelong mate, or even cage the mate with another bird before a race, attempting to stir the racer's "jealousy" to fly home desperately[citation:5].

A more serious crime is direct violence and extortion. "Pigeon kidnapping for ransom" is not uncommon. Breeder Huang Nai-shun has paid ransoms multiple times for his kidnapped birds[citation:5]. Furthermore, some cases allegedly involve ties to criminal gangs. Police have raided illegal betting rings operating within local clubs, seizing billions in NTD and leading to officials being jailed[citation:5][citation:7]. The Ministry of the Interior has listed gambling crimes as a key enforcement target, while the Ministry of Agriculture stated illegal gambling is the industry's "main source of revenue"[citation:5].

The Core Controversy: The Harsh Offshore System and Animal Welfare

To address rampant cheating in land-based races, Taiwan moved all formal competitions offshore in the late 1990s, developing the unique "offshore young bird multi-stage racing system"[citation:3][citation:5]. Racing pigeons are loaded onto container ships to compete over routes of more than 300 kilometers across open sea[citation:3]. However, this change has also pushed pigeon racing into more dangerous territory and triggered major animal welfare controversies.

Animal rights groups strongly condemn this system, alleging large numbers of pigeons are forced to race in bad weather, ending up lost or falling into the sea[citation:5]. Professor Chuang Kuo-pin of National Pingtung University estimates only about 10% of offshore racing pigeons return safely; the remaining 90%, if not eliminated by nature, become feral populations impacting the ecosystem[citation:8]. Ho Tsung-hsun, Secretary-General of the Taiwan Animal Protection Monitoring Network, cited a PETA USA investigation video showing many pigeons drowning, unable to endure long sea flights[citation:8]. Animal protection groups initiated a referendum proposal to ban offshore pigeon racing in June 2024. Although ultimately rejected, it successfully sparked public discussion[citation:3].

Pigeon fanciers interpret dropout rates differently. Wu Chung-ming stated that about 60% of pigeons are registered as returned by the season's end, and the high dropout rates are a misunderstanding regarding late returnees[citation:5]. He admitted that mistreatment is terrible for real pigeon lovers too and expressed willingness to talk to animal groups, even favoring a return to land races to reduce casualties[citation:5]. The complexity lies in that many fanciers believe only fair, clean competitions could reduce reliance on the offshore system[citation:5]. But the cruelty of sea races lies not only in the process but also in the outcome. The fate of non-winning or lost racing pigeons is often tragic—they may be killed, have their wings broken, or be abandoned, putting immense pressure on rescue groups after each season[citation:3].

Industry Dilemma and the Crossroads of the Future

Taiwan's pigeon racing industry is currently stuck in an awkward "legal vacuum." The appeal of Chairman Wu Chung-ming represents the heartfelt wish of many insiders: "If it's illegal, then please shut us all down as soon as possible; but if it's legal, then shouldn't there be some policies to support us?"[citation:5]

The industry is divided over "legalization." Supporters argue that legalization, though potentially bringing taxation and more regulations, would at least allow the massive financial transactions and peripheral industries (breeding stock, feed, loft construction, etc.) to operate openly. According to fanciers' estimates, Taiwan's roughly 500,000 pigeon-racing households may support nearly a million related workers[citation:8]. Opponents worry that government intervention, under pressure from international animal rights groups, could hinder races, preferring the status quo[citation:8]. Animal protection groups firmly oppose legalization but, aware of the difficulty of an outright ban, instead urge the government to first ban the cruelest sea races and better investigate illegal activities[citation:5][citation:8].

Government departments are cautious. The Ministry of Agriculture indicated that legitimizing the sport would require new legislation, creating a competent authority, strong industry self-regulation, and an end to illegal gambling[citation:5]. However, progress is minimal, and the entire industry continues to operate in a grey area.

For many participants, pigeon racing means far more than money. Twenty-nine-year-old fancier Lin Yo-Chen compares training racing pigeons to "training your own Olympic athletes"[citation:5]. Octogenarian Chen Bi-chou, with seventy years of experience, loves the community and tactical thinking the sport brings[citation:5]. A retired prison guard described the incomparable emotion of seeing his carefully trained pigeons struggling home in bad weather[citation:5]. These feelings are genuine, but how to preserve this culture and passion without harming animals or fostering crime is a challenge Taiwanese society must face together. The future of this sport depends on whether a balance can be found between industry self-discipline, legal frameworks, and societal values.

DisclaimerThe content provided on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, breeding, or medical advice. All data is cited from public sources. AviQ is not responsible for the accuracy of the data or any losses incurred from the use of this information.